Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 3 Nov 2004 00:23:18 +0100 | From | Jan Kasprzak <> | Subject | [PATCH] Minor fix of RCU documentation |
| |
Hello, all!
the attached patch fixes an incorrect example in Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt - the "original" lock-based code should not call RCU functions, of course.
-Yenya
Signed-Off-By: Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas@fi.muni.cz>
--- linux-2.6.9/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt.orig 2004-10-18 23:53:44.000000000 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.9/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt 2004-10-30 14:49:42.706526360 +0200 @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ list_for_each_entry(e, list, list) { if (!audit_compare_rule(rule, &e->rule)) { list_del(&e->list); - call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule, e); + write_unlock(&auditsc_lock); return 0; } } -- | Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas at {fi.muni.cz - work | yenya.net - private}> | | GPG: ID 1024/D3498839 Fingerprint 0D99A7FB206605D7 8B35FCDE05B18A5E | | http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/ Czech Linux Homepage: http://www.linux.cz/ | > Whatever the Java applications and desktop dances may lead to, Unix will < > still be pushing the packets around for a quite a while. --Rob Pike < - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |