Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | [patch 09/10] mtd/cfi_cmdset_0002: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep() | From | janitor@sternwel ... | Date | Sat, 20 Nov 2004 03:34:53 +0100 |
| |
Any comments would be appreciated.
Description: Use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee the task delays as expected.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Attems <janitor@sternwelten.at>
---
linux-2.6.10-rc2-bk4-max/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c | 6 ++---- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c~msleep-drivers_mtd_chips_cfi_cmdset_0002 drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c --- linux-2.6.10-rc2-bk4/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c~msleep-drivers_mtd_chips_cfi_cmdset_0002 2004-11-19 17:15:36.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.10-rc2-bk4-max/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c 2004-11-19 17:15:36.000000000 +0100 @@ -1173,8 +1173,7 @@ static inline int do_erase_chip(struct m chip->in_progress_block_addr = adr; cfi_spin_unlock(chip->mutex); - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); - schedule_timeout((chip->erase_time*HZ)/(2*1000)); + msleep(chip->erase_time/2); cfi_spin_lock(chip->mutex); timeo = jiffies + (HZ*20); @@ -1259,8 +1258,7 @@ static inline int do_erase_oneblock(stru chip->in_progress_block_addr = adr; cfi_spin_unlock(chip->mutex); - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); - schedule_timeout((chip->erase_time*HZ)/(2*1000)); + msleep(chip->erase_time/2); cfi_spin_lock(chip->mutex); timeo = jiffies + (HZ*20); _ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |