lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
richard.brunner@amd.com
In-Reply-To: <20030930073814.GA26649@mail.jlokier.co.uk>
References: <20030930073814.GA26649@mail.jlokier.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mutilated form of Andi Kleen's AMD prefetch errata patch

Quote from Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>:

> 2. Nevertheless, when a kernel _not_ optimised for those AMD processors
> is run on one, the "alternative" mechanism now correctly replaces
> prefetch instructions with nops.

> It's a reasonable argument that if a kernel version, say 2.6.0, promises
> to hide the errata from _userspace_ programs, then the generic or
> not-AMD-optimised kernels should do that too. Otherwise userspace may
> as well provide the workaround itself, by catching SIGSEGV - because it
> is perfectly normal and common to run a generic kernel on an AMD.

This problem, and others like it, would be solved for ever with
Adrian's bitmap-of-supported-cpus patch, though. With that, there is
no 'generic' kernel, either it supports Athlons, or it doesn't. 100%
elimination of Athlon specific code for other CPUs. Everybody is
happy.

Of course a kernel compiled strictly for 386s may seem to boot on an
Athlon but not work properly. So what? Just don't run the 'wrong'
kernel.

John.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.037 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site