Messages in this thread | | | From | "Stuart MacDonald" <> | Subject | RE: Driver Model | Date | Wed, 3 Sep 2003 10:36:16 -0400 |
| |
From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of > Richard B. Johnson > sources are available. If the driver does not contain the appropriate > MODULE_LICENSE() string, then several tools will show "tainted" so
If the MODULE_LICENSE() macro is what determines taint, what's to prevent a company from compiling their driver in their own kernel tree with that macro and releasing it binary-only? Wouldn't that module then be taint-free?
..Stu
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |