Messages in this thread | | | Subject | CLONE_SIGHAND w/o CLONE_VM | From | Albert Cahalan <> | Date | 21 Sep 2003 22:54:05 -0400 |
| |
Does CLONE_SIGHAND without CLONE_VM ever make sense?
Note that the arch-specific kernel_thread() implementations add CLONE_VM, so kernel_thread() usage doesn't count unless you can point to an arch that doesn't add the CLONE_VM flag. (BTW, the user-mode port is missing CLONE_UNTRACED. Bug?)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |