lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: devfs to be obsloted by udev?
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:32:20AM -0400, Ed Sweetman wrote:
> >>I dont see the real benefit in having two directories that basically
> >>give the same info.
> >
> >What "two directories"? udev can handle /dev. What other directory are
> >you talking about?
>
> in your readme you use the example of making the device root for udev
> /udev ... I thought that was the official suggestion since udev couldn't
> be loaded immediately at kernel boot.

That's my suggestion today if you want to have a machine that's usable
:)

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:32:20AM -0400, Ed Sweetman wrote:
> >>I dont see the real benefit in having two directories that basically
> >>give the same info.
> >
> >What "two directories"? udev can handle /dev. What other directory are
> >you talking about?
>
> in your readme you use the example of making the device root for udev
> /udev ... I thought that was the official suggestion since udev couldn't
> be loaded immediately at kernel boot.

That's my suggestion today if you want to have a machine that's usable
:)

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.294 / U:0.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site