Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 2 Sep 2003 11:44:40 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: devfs to be obsloted by udev? |
| |
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:32:20AM -0400, Ed Sweetman wrote: > >>I dont see the real benefit in having two directories that basically > >>give the same info. > > > >What "two directories"? udev can handle /dev. What other directory are > >you talking about? > > in your readme you use the example of making the device root for udev > /udev ... I thought that was the official suggestion since udev couldn't > be loaded immediately at kernel boot.
That's my suggestion today if you want to have a machine that's usable :)
greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:32:20AM -0400, Ed Sweetman wrote: > >>I dont see the real benefit in having two directories that basically > >>give the same info. > > > >What "two directories"? udev can handle /dev. What other directory are > >you talking about? > > in your readme you use the example of making the device root for udev > /udev ... I thought that was the official suggestion since udev couldn't > be loaded immediately at kernel boot.
That's my suggestion today if you want to have a machine that's usable :)
greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |