Messages in this thread | | | From | Rob Landley <> | Subject | Re: headers | Date | Tue, 19 Aug 2003 08:55:06 -0400 |
| |
On Monday 18 August 2003 21:45, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Followup to: <UTC200308181907.h7IJ7im12407.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl> > By author: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > From garzik@gtf.org Mon Aug 18 20:14:47 2003 > > > > I support include/abi, or some other directory that segregates > > user<->kernel shared headers away from kernel-private headers. > > > > I don't see how that would be auto-generated, though. Only created > > through lots of hard work :) > > > > Yes, unfortunately. I started doing some of this a few times, > > but it is an order of magnitude more work than one thinks at first. > > Already the number of include files is very large. > > And the fact that it is not just include/abi but involves the > > architecture doesn't make life simpler. > > > > No doubt we must first discuss a little bit, but not too much, > > the desired directory structure and naming. > > Then we must do 5% of the work, and come back to these issues. > > > > In case people actually want to do this, I can coordinate. > > > > In case people want to try just one file, do signal.h. > > Oh yes, this is a whole lot of work.
But is it 2.6 work, or 2.8 work?
Rob
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |