Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:56:06 -0700 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.0-test2-mm1 results |
| |
--Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote (on Thursday, July 31, 2003 01:28:49 +1000):
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:01, Martin J. Bligh wrote: >> OK, so test2-mm1 fixes the panic I was seeing in test1-mm1. >> Only noticeable thing is that -mm tree is consistently a little slower >> at kernbench > > Could conceivably be my hacks throwing the cc cpu hogs onto the expired array > more frequently.
Kernbench: (make -j vmlinux, maximal tasks) Elapsed System User CPU 2.6.0-test2 46.05 115.20 571.75 1491.25 2.6.0-test2-con 46.98 121.02 583.55 1498.75 2.6.0-test2-mm1 46.95 121.18 582.00 1497.50
Good guess ;-)
Does this help interactivity a lot, or was it just an experiment? Perhaps it could be less agressive or something?
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |