Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Jul 2003 09:20:43 +1200 | From | Nigel Cunningham <> | Subject | Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: Thoughts wanted on merging Software Suspend enhancements |
| |
Without debugging code it could look more like..
> > [nigel@laptop-linux nigel]$ ls -l /proc/swsusp/ > > total 0 > > -rw------- 1 root root 0 Jul 15 08:28 enable_escape > > -rw------- 1 root root 0 Jul 15 08:28 image_size_limit > > -r-------- 1 root root 0 Jul 15 08:28 interface_version > > -r-------- 1 root root 0 Jul 15 08:28 last_result > > -r-------- 1 root root 0 Jul 15 08:28 version > > [nigel@laptop-linux nigel]$ > > > Ouch.. But how many of these /proc tweaks need to stay there once > debugging is done? I do not like any configuration options for > swsusp... It should just work. [Okay, we probably need to have resume= > parameter.]
It does just work, but there is room for preferences too. I like flexibility, and try to build it into my code.
> For 2.4.X I don't care. For official tree, it has to "just work" with > as little configuration as possible. [Besides enable_escape, what else > might user want to tweak?]
The limit on the size of the image (they may want a smaller image than the amount of swap they have).
-- Nigel Cunningham 495 St Georges Road South, Hastings 4201, New Zealand
You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless, Christ died for the ungodly. -- Romans 5:6, NIV.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |