Messages in this thread | | | From | Michael Frank <> | Subject | Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: Thoughts wanted on merging Software Suspend enhancements | Date | Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:41:23 +0800 |
| |
On Monday 14 July 2003 09:54, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Okay. > > Having listened to the arguments, I'll make pressing Escape to cancel > the suspend a feature which defaults to being disabled and can be > enabled via a proc entry in 2.4.
OK!
I won't add code to poll for ACPI (or > APM) events :>
Sounds like a reasonable tradeoff
> > Regards, > > Nigel > > On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 09:09, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > Escape is more intuitively obvious though - I would expect the suspend > > > button to only start a suspend. And the idea of escape cancelling > > > anything is well in-grained in peoples' minds. > > > > You did not initiate suspend from keyboard => you should not > > terminate it from keyboard. > >
Overruled ;) -- Powered by linux-2.5.75-mm1. Compiled with gcc-2.95-3 - mature and rock solid
My current linux related activities: - 2.5 yenta_socket testing - Test development and testing of swsusp for 2.4/2.5 and ACPI S3 of 2.5 kernel - Everyday usage of 2.5 kernel
More info on 2.5 kernel: http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/post-halloween-2.5.txt More info on swsusp: http://sourceforge.net/projects/swsusp/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |