Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | [PATCH][v850] show_stack changes for v850 | Date | Tue, 24 Jun 2003 14:27:17 +0900 (JST) | From | (Miles Bader) |
| |
diff -ruN -X../cludes linux-2.5.73-moo/arch/v850/kernel/bug.c linux-2.5.73-moo-v850-20030624/arch/v850/kernel/bug.c --- linux-2.5.73-moo/arch/v850/kernel/bug.c 2003-02-25 10:44:59.000000000 +0900 +++ linux-2.5.73-moo-v850-20030624/arch/v850/kernel/bug.c 2003-06-23 15:16:50.000000000 +0900 @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #include <asm/errno.h> #include <asm/ptrace.h> +#include <asm/processor.h> #include <asm/current.h> /* We should use __builtin_return_address, but it doesn't work in gcc-2.90 @@ -100,12 +101,21 @@ } } -void show_stack (unsigned long *sp) -{ - unsigned long end; - unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)sp; - - if (! addr) +/* + * TASK is a pointer to the task whose backtrace we want to see (or NULL + * for current task), SP is the stack pointer of the first frame that + * should be shown in the back trace (or NULL if the entire call-chain of + * the task should be shown). + */ +void show_stack (struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp) +{ + unsigned long addr, end; + + if (sp) + addr = (unsigned long)sp; + else if (task) + addr = task_sp (task); + else addr = stack_addr (); addr = addr & ~3; @@ -125,5 +135,5 @@ void dump_stack () { - show_stack (0); + show_stack (0, 0); } - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |