Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <> | Subject | RE: Sco vs. IBM | Date | Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:21:01 -0700 |
| |
> From: miquels@cistron-office.nl [mailto:miquels@cistron-office.nl] > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:34 AM > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: Sco vs. IBM > > In article <20030619141443.GR29247@fs.tum.de>, > Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> wrote: > >There's no license reason today why there are two big desktop projects > >(GNOME and KDE). > > There is. If you want to develop a commercial application under > KDE you need to pay TrollTech for the Qt license. Basically > TrollTech controls all commercial KDE applications.
I'd say that GPL file appended to the dual license of Qt says otherwise ... but IANAL...
Iñaky Pérez-González -- Not speaking for Intel -- all opinions are my own (and my fault) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |