Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Wed, 18 Jun 2003 21:18:04 -0500 | From | Mark Peloquin <> | Subject | [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20 vs 2.5.71 comparison |
| |
Thought some of you might get a kick out of seeing this. :)
Nightly Regression Summary for 2.4.20 vs 2.5.71
Benchmark Pass/Fail Improvements Regressions Results Results Summary --------------- --------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- -------
dbench.ext2 P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report dbench.ext3 P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report dbench.jfs P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report dbench.reiser P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report dbench.xfs P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report kernbench P N N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report lmbench P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report rawiobench P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report specjbb P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report specsdet P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report tbench P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report tiobench.ext2 P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report tiobench.ext3 P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report tiobench.jfs P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report tiobench.reiser P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report tiobench.xfs P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report volanomark P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
http://ltcperf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/data/2.5.71/2.4.20-vs-2.5.71/
Mark
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |