Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 15 Jun 2003 18:17:03 +0100 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: bad: scheduling while atomic! |
| |
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 06:14:38PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 14:29, Russell King wrote: > > It would be useful if we could balance the spin_locks with the > > spin_unlocks. 8) > > I can see how that could be considered appropriate. There are a handful > of other such trivia in CVS which want to go to Linus shortly -- I > assume that includes your afs partitioning fix?
Yes, although I was considering sending that one myself. If you're due to do another sync up, feel free to include that.
-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |