Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: bad: scheduling while atomic! | From | David Woodhouse <> | Date | Sun, 15 Jun 2003 18:14:38 +0100 |
| |
On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 14:29, Russell King wrote: > It would be useful if we could balance the spin_locks with the > spin_unlocks. 8)
I can see how that could be considered appropriate. There are a handful of other such trivia in CVS which want to go to Linus shortly -- I assume that includes your afs partitioning fix?
-- dwmw2
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |