Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 9 May 2003 07:09:34 -0400 | From | Chuck Ebbert <> | Subject | Re: The disappearing sys_call_table export. |
| |
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> I'm currently trying to work with some other subscribers of this list on > a design. Getting 1, 2 and 3 is a complicated enough task, of course. I > would like to hear estimates about inclusion chances should we manage to > come up with an implmentation that lives up to all the above.
How many users would want to actually modify the syscall parameters or change visible system behavior when a syscall happens?
Maybe something like this would work?
1. You can register to be notified when a syscall occurs, either before or after or both. 2. The only action you can take must be 'private' (within your driver or subsystem.)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |