Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 May 2003 12:20:30 -0700 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | [Bug 738] New: kernel BUG at fs/jbd/transaction.c:2023! |
| |
Summary: kernel BUG at fs/jbd/transaction.c:2023! Kernel Version: 2.5.69-mm8 Status: NEW Severity: normal Owner: akpm@digeo.com Submitter: plars@austin.ibm.com
Distribution: RH 7.3
Hardware Environment: 8-way PIII-700, 16 GB ram
Software Environment: anticipatory scheduler, ext3, preempt enabled
Problem Description: Here's the first BUG output, the full log is attached in case you care about the stream of sleeping function called from illegal context errors that followed. Assertion failure in __journal_refile_buffer() at fs/jbd/transaction.c:2023: "(get_current()->lock_depth >= 0)" ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/jbd/transaction.c:2023! invalid operand: 0000 [#1] CPU: 2 EIP: 0060:[<c01a9e09>] Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00010202 EIP is at __journal_refile_buffer+0x69/0x100 eax: 00000073 ebx: eb787e08 ecx: c05345a0 edx: 00000001 esi: ffffffff edi: f7c2b6e8 ebp: f565e8c8 esp: eaf7da20 ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068 Process ftest07 (pid: 18246, threadinfo=eaf7c000 task=f5e1e040) Stack: c0415ca0 c040f7d3 c040f51a 000007e7 c0418440 f7c2b79c eb787e08 f7c2b6e8 c01a8c60 eb787e08 00008000 ffffffff 00000000 f49b519c c0198202 f013c1cc f49b519c 00000001 c0160744 f7c5d6dc 00188003 00001000 00000030 00000031 Call Trace: [<c01a8c60>] journal_release_buffer+0x90/0x100 [<c0198202>] ext3_try_to_allocate+0x172/0x190 [<c0160744>] __bread+0x14/0x30 [<c019848d>] ext3_new_block+0x26d/0x610 [<c019d5e7>] ext3_do_update_inode+0x2e7/0x370 [<c019a9cd>] ext3_alloc_block+0x1d/0x30 [<c019ad45>] ext3_alloc_branch+0x45/0x280 [<c01605fa>] bh_lru_install+0xca/0xf0 [<c019b31f>] ext3_get_block_handle+0x20f/0x2f0 [<c0162b43>] alloc_buffer_head+0x13/0x60 [<c015ff87>] create_buffers+0x57/0xb0 [<c019b460>] ext3_get_block+0x60/0x70 [<c0161070>] __block_prepare_write+0x140/0x3e0 [<c010829c>] __up_wakeup+0x8/0xc [<c0161bf0>] block_prepare_write+0x20/0x40 [<c019b400>] ext3_get_block+0x0/0x70 [<c019b882>] ext3_prepare_write+0x42/0xe0 [<c019b400>] ext3_get_block+0x0/0x70 [<c013e12e>] generic_file_aio_write_nolock+0x66e/0xac0 [<c013bb9a>] unlock_page+0xa/0x50 [<c013c994>] file_read_actor+0x64/0xd0 [<c013c9a1>] file_read_actor+0x71/0xd0 [<c013c535>] do_generic_mapping_read+0xf5/0x4f0 [<c0179a2d>] update_atime+0x6d/0xc0 [<c013cbb5>] __generic_file_aio_read+0x1b5/0x1e0 [<c013e619>] generic_file_write_nolock+0x99/0xc0 [<c011f7c0>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40 [<c011f7c0>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40 [<c02fa058>] scsi_init_io+0xa8/0x110 [<c011f7c0>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40 [<c02c6b98>] as_next_request+0x18/0x30 [<c0142b89>] check_poison_obj+0x39/0x190 [<c0144a5a>] kmalloc+0xfa/0x1c0 [<c013e850>] generic_file_writev+0x40/0x60 [<c015dc30>] do_readv_writev+0x1c0/0x270 [<c015d6d0>] do_sync_write+0x0/0xe0 [<c015d07d>] generic_file_llseek+0x2d/0xd0 [<c015d050>] generic_file_llseek+0x0/0xd0 [<c015dd77>] vfs_writev+0x47/0x50 [<c015ddff>] sys_writev+0x2f/0x50 [<c01094df>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Code: ff ff 21 e0 8b 00 8b 70 14 85 f6 79 29 68 40 84 41 c0 68 e7 07 00 00 68 1a f5 40 c0 68 d3 f7 40 c0 68 a0 5c 41 c0 e8 27 85 f7 ff <0f> 0b e7 07 1a f5 40 c0 83 c4 14 8b 4b 18 85 c9 75 15 53 e8 2f
Steps to reproduce: I was actually trying to reproduce an error I caught the tail end of earlier when I was trying to compile LTP. This doesn't look like the same error, and I couldn't get a kernel compile or an LTP compile to cause an error for me again.
What I was doing when I got this error was running ltp (current cvs copy), runalltests -q |tee /tmp/ltp.out ### ftest07 was the test currently running when it crashed
At the same time, I was also running variations on the aio01 test in ltp (not currently part of runalltests) aio01 -n100000 aio01 -c10 -n10000 ### at this point nothing came back, so I'm uncertain as to whether it hung before this test or hung as I executed it.
I went back and tried running all of these tests alone and had no failure. So it could be somewhat random. I have not tested 2.5.69-mm7 or vanilla 2.5.69 in this fashion but my regular runs of 2.5.69 vanilla did not expose this. If there isn't enough to go on here though, let me know and I'll be happy to try it on mm7 or 2.5.69, or do patch bisection if I can get a reliable way to recreate the problem.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |