Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Thu, 15 May 2003 11:16:12 -0700 | From | Ulrich Drepper <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> He didn't say static linking he said static library. I assume he meant a > .a lib instead of a .so lib. One which has elements which are made part of > the executable instead of being part of a shared library.
And in what way does this not match what I say? The content of the DSO and the archive is identical functionality-wise and therefore none of this ever has any influence on whether futexes are used or not.
- -- - --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `--------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+w9ls2ijCOnn/RHQRAsfAAJ9sSbudcXdNSHYAB6ICm/fXWRhuQQCgqmMD cwxSzwuFEeeS6ACGonakUy8= =+/L9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |