lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bill Davidsen wrote:

> He didn't say static linking he said static library. I assume he meant a
> .a lib instead of a .so lib. One which has elements which are made part of
> the executable instead of being part of a shared library.

And in what way does this not match what I say? The content of the DSO
and the archive is identical functionality-wise and therefore none of
this ever has any influence on whether futexes are used or not.

- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+w9ls2ijCOnn/RHQRAsfAAJ9sSbudcXdNSHYAB6ICm/fXWRhuQQCgqmMD
cwxSzwuFEeeS6ACGonakUy8=
=+/L9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.029 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site