Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Thu, 15 May 2003 10:45:43 -0700 | From | Ulrich Drepper <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Ingo Oeser wrote:
> Is this also the case, if I don't want threading at all on my > system? Does glibc still have a seperate static library for this,
This has nothing to do with static linking or not.
glibc, when compiled with nptl, will always include uses of futexes. But since there is no contention and the fast path is entirely handled at userlevel, the actual kernel functionality is not required.
- -- - --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `--------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+w9JH2ijCOnn/RHQRApR/AKCHcHAUsXfz834/ZH0z3iQneNMh4gCfUMzA RB4+2XbfsJZXpkWQUx5NXPY= =XGtI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |