Messages in this thread | | | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.63-mm2 + i/o schedulers with contest | Date | Wed, 5 Mar 2003 17:02:10 +1100 |
| |
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:10 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote: > > Mem_load result of AS being slower was just plain weird with the result > > rising from 100 to 150 during testing. > > Maybe we should just swap computers or something? > > Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 145 user: 180 system: 18 > Finished mem_load: elapsed: 146 user: 0 system: 2 loads: 5000 > Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 135 user: 181 system: 17 > Finished mem_load: elapsed: 136 user: 0 system: 2 loads: 4800 > Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 129 user: 181 system: 17 > Finished mem_load: elapsed: 130 user: 0 system: 2 loads: 4800 > > 256MB, dual CPU, ext3/IDE.
Tried again - these were done as part of a full contest run, not just mem_load by itself, but these were the mem_load results:
98 128 135
then it oopsed (the one I posted earlier) and wasn't really usable after that point. Perhaps they're related. The mystery remains. I'll see what happens next mm release.
Con
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |