Messages in this thread | | | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.63-mm2 + i/o schedulers with contest | Date | Tue, 4 Mar 2003 19:20:19 +1100 |
| |
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:10 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote: > > Mem_load result of AS being slower was just plain weird with the result > > rising from 100 to 150 during testing. > > Maybe we should just swap computers or something?
Well bugger me all I can do is report the results I get, and I filter them a _lot_. I don't want to lead you up the garden path any more than you want to travel it.
> > Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 145 user: 180 system: 18 > Finished mem_load: elapsed: 146 user: 0 system: 2 loads: 5000 > Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 135 user: 181 system: 17 > Finished mem_load: elapsed: 136 user: 0 system: 2 loads: 4800 > Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 129 user: 181 system: 17 > Finished mem_load: elapsed: 130 user: 0 system: 2 loads: 4800 > > 256MB, dual CPU, ext3/IDE. > > Whereas 2.5.63+bk gives: > > Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 131 user: 182 system: 17 > Finished mem_load: elapsed: 131 user: 0 system: 1 loads: 4900 > Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 135 user: 182 system: 17 > Finished mem_load: elapsed: 135 user: 0 system: 1 loads: 4800 > Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 129 user: 182 system: 17 > Finished mem_load: elapsed: 129 user: 0 system: 1 loads: 4600 > > Conceivably swap fragmentation, but unlikely. Is it still doing a swapoff > between runs?
Yes it should be doing it.
Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |