Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 03 Mar 2003 16:45:42 +0000 | From | Andrew Walrond <> | Subject | Re: Patch: 2.5.62.4 small devfs |
| |
Hmmm
I'm already using the existance of .devfsd to see if devfs was mounted by the kernel at boot. This suggests I need a new test for small devfs?
Andrew
jordan.breeding@attbi.com wrote: > if [ -f /dev/.devfsd ]; then > you know you have old devfs > fi > > Jordan (I am fairly certain that it is /dev/.devfsd, you can always do ls - > al /dev/.* to find the real name) > >>Hi Adam >> >>Could you suggest a simple bit of sh script that will tell me if I have >>a devfs or small devfs kernel, (so my init scripts can decide whether or >>not to load devfsd?) >> >>Andrew Walrond >> >> >>- >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |