lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25
Date
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com> writes:

>If that's people's attitude ("you should use a vendor"), then we need a
>2.4-fixed tree to be run by somebody with an interest in providing
>critical bugfixes to the community with no distro ties. People may be
>perfectly capable of finding, applying, and collecting their own patches,
>but that's no reason to make it difficult.

Get the vendors to pay someone equally for it. That's much more likely
to succeed. The current 2.4 model is already doomed, IMHO.

Regards
Henning

--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
hps@intermeta.de +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/

Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services
freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.164 / U:1.316 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site