Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Subject | Re: 2.5.65-mm2 | From | "Steven P. Cole" <> | Date | 19 Mar 2003 16:45:16 -0700 |
| |
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 17:33, Andrew Morton wrote: > "Steven P. Cole" <elenstev@mesatop.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Summary: using ext3, the simple window shake and scrollbar wiggle tests > > > were much improved, but really using Evolution left much to be desired. > > > > Replying to myself for a followup, > > > > I repeated the tests with 2.5.65-mm2 elevator=deadline and the situation > > was similar to elevator=as. Running dbench on ext3, the response to > > desktop switches and window wiggles was improved over running dbench on > > reiserfs, but typing in Evolution was subject to long delays with dbench > > clients greater than 16. > > OK, final question before I get off my butt and find a way to reproduce this: > > Does reverting > > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.65/2.5.65-mm2/broken-out/sched-2.5.64-D3.patch > > help?
Sorry, didn't have much time for a lot of testing, but no miracles occurred. With 5 minutes of testing 2.5.65-mm2 and dbench 24 on ext3 and that patch reverted (first hunk had to be manually fixed), I don't see any improvement. Still the same long long delays in trying to use Evolution.
Steven - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |