Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Wed, 19 Mar 2003 14:17:07 -0800 | From | jjs <> | Subject | Re: 2.5.65-mm2 |
| |
Steven P. Cole wrote:
>I repeated the tests with 2.5.65-mm2 elevator=deadline and the situation >was similar to elevator=as. Running dbench on ext3, the response to >desktop switches and window wiggles was improved over running dbench on >reiserfs, but typing in Evolution was subject to long delays with dbench >clients greater than 16. > >I rebooted with 2.5.65-bk and ran dbench on ext3 again. Everything was >going smoothly, excellent interactivity, and then with dbench 28, the >system froze. No response to pings, no response to alt-sysrq-b (after >alt-sysrq-s). A hard reset was required. Nothing interesting logged. >Too bad. Before it crashed, 2.5.65-bk was responding to typing in an >Evolution new message window better than -mm2. >
Just out of curiosity, what is the result of:
cat /proc/sys/sched/max_timeslice?
Does setting that to e.g. 50 make -mm2 smooth?
Joe
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |