Messages in this thread Patch in this message | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Tue, 11 Mar 2003 09:15:13 +0100 (CET) | From | Soos Peter <> | Subject | APM vs. ACPI status detection |
| |
Hi,
I have a little patch witch sets apm_info.disabled flag not only if APM disabled by user but if it disabled by SMP or ACPI. Please apply.
<-- Cut here --> --- ./arch/i386/kernel/apm.c.orig Tue Mar 11 08:59:24 2003 +++ ./arch/i386/kernel/apm.c Tue Mar 11 09:00:30 2003 @@ -1906,10 +1906,12 @@ } if ((smp_num_cpus > 1) && !power_off) { printk(KERN_NOTICE "apm: disabled - APM is not SMP safe.\n"); + apm_info.disabled = 1; return -ENODEV; } if (PM_IS_ACTIVE()) { printk(KERN_NOTICE "apm: overridden by ACPI.\n"); + apm_info.disabled = 1; return -ENODEV; } pm_active = 1; <-- Cut here --> Regards, -- Soós Péter Pannonhalmi Főapátság / Archabbey of Pannonhalma H-9090 Pannonhalma, Vár 1. Tel: +3696570189, Fax: +3696470011
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |