Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Mar 2003 20:29:45 +0100 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Would the real 82801E_9 please stand up. (fwd) |
| |
The issue described in Dave's mail below is still present:
2.4.21-pre5-ac1: #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_9 0x2459 #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_11 0x245B
2.5.64-ac3: #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_9 0x245b #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_11 PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_9
Jens: The patch that did the #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_11 PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_9 in 2.5 was sent by you, could you comment on this issue?
TIA Adrian
----- Forwarded message from Dave Jones <davej@suse.de> -----
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 23:58:52 +0200 From: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de> To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Would the real 82801E_9 please stand up.
Whilst syncing 2.4.19rc1, I spotted this problem in pci_ids.h
2.4..
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_9 0x2459
2.5..
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_9 0x245b
In a word.. eughhh
Dave.
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
----- End forwarded message -----
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |