Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 06 Feb 2003 09:06:30 -0800 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: gcc -O2 vs gcc -Os performance |
| |
>> All done with gcc-2.95.4 (Debian Woody). These machines (16x NUMA-Q) have >> 700MHz P3 Xeons with 2Mb L2 cache ... -Os might fare better on celeron >> with a puny cache if someone wants to try that out > > gcc 3.2 is a lot smarter about -Os and it makes a very big size > difference according to the numbers the from the ACPI guys. > > Im not sure testing with a gcc from the last millenium is useful 8)
I'll retest with gcc-3.2 ... maybe it'll finally show a case where it's better than 2.95 this way?
<ducks> <runs>
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |