Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:40:41 -0800 | From | Patrick Mansfield <> | Subject | Re: [Lse-tech] Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance |
| |
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 08:27:28AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > >>> Comparing Intel's compiler vs GCC on Linux would be more interesting. > >>> Anyone got a copy and some time to burn? > >> > >> There are already people who have done this, e.g. > >> > >> http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/intel_comp/intel_gcc_bench2.html > >> > >> compares g++ and Intel's C++ compiler with C++ code. > > > > C would be infinitely more interesting ;-) > > Speaking of which, has anyone ever compiled the ia32 Linux kernel with the > Intel compiler? I thought I saw some patches floating around to make it > compile the ia64 kernel .... that'd be an interesting test case ... might > give us some ideas about what could be tweaked in GCC (or code rejiggled in > the kernel). > > M.
Martin -
Like this?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103559880923586&w=2
-- Patrick Mansfield - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |