Messages in this thread Patch in this message | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | javaman <> | Subject | [PATCH 2.5.x, 2.4.x ...] very small | Date | Fri, 21 Feb 2003 15:25:17 +0100 |
| |
A very small patch (my first patch :-) for Documentation/spinlocks.txt: it replace "IFF" with "IF" ;-)
bye, Paolo
--- Documentation/spinlocks.txt.orig Fri Feb 21 15:02:01 2003 +++ Documentation/spinlocks.txt Fri Feb 21 15:02:44 2003 @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ If you have a case where you have to protect a data structure across several CPU's and you want to use spinlocks you can potentially use -cheaper versions of the spinlocks. IFF you know that the spinlocks are +cheaper versions of the spinlocks. IF you know that the spinlocks are never used in interrupt handlers, you can use the non-irq versions: spin_lock(&lock); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |