Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | Osamu Tomita <> | Subject | RE: [PATCHSET] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.61 (23/26) SCSI | Date | Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:37:42 +0900 |
| |
Thanks for many advices about pc980155 driver. I'm trying to cleanup it.
>> +int pc98_bios_param(struct block_device *bdev, int *ip) > > This should _not_ be in sd.c but the lowlevel driver. There is a specification for PC98 SCSI HA. So we can use this function commonly across all HA (except for bad clones). I think, this is better than patching many drivers by same way. Is this a bad idea?
>> +static spinlock_t wd_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; > > Where is this used? I forgot to remove it.
Thanks, Osamu Tomita
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |