Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Thu, 20 Feb 2003 07:07:48 +0900 (JST) | Subject | Re: [PATCH] IPSec protocol application order | From | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <> |
| |
In article <20030219.133906.127189630.davem@redhat.com> (at Wed, 19 Feb 2003 13:39:06 -0800 (PST)), "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> says:
> setkey is for manual keying and debugging. Therefore, disallowing > experimenting with non-rfc-compliant orderings seems to lack purpose > to me.
I'm for davem. Setkey is very flexible manual-keying tool and we should not limit this flexibility.
--yoshfuji - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |