Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Wed, 19 Feb 2003 13:39:06 -0800 (PST) | Subject | Re: [PATCH] IPSec protocol application order | From | "David S. Miller" <> |
| |
From: "Tom Lendacky" <toml@us.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:48:14 -0600
So if you would prefer to not do this in the kernel you can ignore the patch, but then the setkey application needs to be fixed.
In one sense yes, but in another no.
setkey is for manual keying and debugging. Therefore, disallowing experimenting with non-rfc-compliant orderings seems to lack purpose to me. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |