Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Subject | /proc/kmsg | Date | Tue, 18 Feb 2003 16:03:31 -0000 | From | "John Hall" <> |
| |
Hi,
I'm trying to write a small syslogd that has no need of a separate klogd. So I can use select, I'm attempting to read from /proc/kmsg instead of using the syslog syscall. However, it seems very unreliable - I don't see quite a few of the messages I should do. I'm using a 2.4.18-rmk7 kernel.
Is /proc/kmsg inherently unreliable for what I'm doing or am I doing something wrong?
Cheers, John - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |