Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Sat, 20 Dec 2003 17:36:28 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] 2.6.0-test11 sched_clock() broken for "drifty ITC" |
| |
* Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote:
> I'm just thinking that computers with unsynched clocks have less need > for good interactivity, but thats probably too narrow and x86 a view > anyway.
it's also a matter of predictable behavior. The scheduler should not behave differently just because there's no synchronized clock. Behavioral forks like that tend to come back and cause trouble later.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |