Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 20 Dec 2003 07:05:32 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] 2.6.0-test11 sched_clock() broken for "drifty ITC" |
| |
Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote: > > > > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > >So i believe the generic relaxing of sched_clock() synchronization is > >the right thing to do. I like your patch. It adds minimal overhead and > >solves a hard problem - nice work! Andrew, please apply it. > > > > > > Its a great looking patch if you must have high res sched_clock. So > I guess I agree with it.
miaow ;)
> Can we have a scheduler day when Andrew is ready to take patches for > it? I have a few small changes that I'd like to get merged soon too > (not sched domains - that should probably go to the mm tree for a while) > > Relevant patches are > sched-ctx-count-preempt.patch > sched-fork-cleanup.patch > sched-migrate-comment.patch > sched-style.patch > sched-migrate-affinity-race.patch >
Post 'em. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |