Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Dec 2003 19:36:00 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.0-test11-mm1 |
| |
Thomas Molina <tmolina@cablespeed.com> wrote: > > Quite frankly I am becoming concerned about the number of patches that are > queued for post 2.6.0. It is beginning to look like 2.6.0 might be nice > and quiet while 2.6.1+ are going to be quite messy as all the things "on > hold" get put in.
Well, most of these things do address real problems. It's a matter of feeding them in at an appropriate rate and with a higher level of testing.
> I'm going to do my part by pounding heavily on -mm kernels since that > appears where all this is ending up.
That would be useful. Testing on non-ia32 platforms remains a concern. I test on ia64 and ppc64, but I'm not aware of anyone regularly testing -mm things on other architectures. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |