lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.0-test11-mm1
Thomas Molina <tmolina@cablespeed.com> wrote:
>
> Quite frankly I am becoming concerned about the number of patches that are
> queued for post 2.6.0. It is beginning to look like 2.6.0 might be nice
> and quiet while 2.6.1+ are going to be quite messy as all the things "on
> hold" get put in.

Well, most of these things do address real problems. It's a matter of
feeding them in at an appropriate rate and with a higher level of testing.

> I'm going to do my part by pounding heavily on -mm kernels since that
> appears where all this is ending up.

That would be useful. Testing on non-ia32 platforms remains a concern. I
test on ia64 and ppc64, but I'm not aware of anyone regularly testing -mm
things on other architectures.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.081 / U:0.852 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site