Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:24:17 -0500 (EST) | From | Thomas Molina <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.0-test11-mm1 |
| |
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Christian Axelsson <smiler@lanil.mine.nu> wrote: > > > > Andrew Walrond wrote: > > > On Wednesday 17 Dec 2003 9:43 am, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > What are your intentions with -mm when you take over 2.6? Is any of -mm > > > getting into 2.6 before 2.6.0 release? Is it mainly queued for 2.6.1? > > We'll start merging it up after 2.6.0. It'll be quite a lot of work, > actually - a lot of things have been parked in -mm for some time and may > not have had sufficiently wide testing, especially on non-i386. I need to > ask the originators and others to re-review and retest some things. > > > I would like to know aswell :) > > Will you be "bleeding edge" maintainer aswell or will that be handed > > over to someone else? > > I guess I'll keep -mm going until there's a reason not to.
Quite frankly I am becoming concerned about the number of patches that are queued for post 2.6.0. It is beginning to look like 2.6.0 might be nice and quiet while 2.6.1+ are going to be quite messy as all the things "on hold" get put in.
I'm going to do my part by pounding heavily on -mm kernels since that appears where all this is ending up. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |