Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Fri, 7 Nov 2003 12:07:08 -0800 (PST) | Subject | CRAMFS | From | "Bradley Bozarth" <> |
| |
Daniel Quinlan originally maintained this, now it is orphaned. His endian patch, which implemented the correct behavior according to the docs (which basically listed always do little endian as a todo), was dropped.
We have been maintaining this patch on our kernel, but it really should go in - I don't want to spend a ton of time like I did last time to have it dropped again, however - is anyone thinking of maintaining cramfs? What are the chances of the endian fix going in if I submit it again? (if even the former maintainer had no success). I would maintain cramfs if desired - it hasn't really changed in a long time except in regards to higher level fs changes.
Thanks, Brad - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |