Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 9 Oct 2003 08:17:48 -0700 (PDT) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Fix mlockall for PROT_NONE mappings |
| |
On 9 Oct 2003, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Ok. But what is with mappings that have MAY_READ not set ? > [not 100% this cannot happen]
Well, PROT_NONE will not have MAY_READ set, and no, they won't get locked into memory.
But neither did they get locked in before either, so it's not like it's a new issue. Now we'd just ignore them nicely rather than abort the lockall(). Hmm?
Linus
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |