lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: [PATCH] incorrect use of sizeof() in ioctl definitions
Date
From
Well, I may misunderstand the measurement here. By previous comment from
Matthew Wilcox, I see "Clearly it's too late to change the ioctl
definitions...". Er, so all things like IOR_BAD and size_t are just to
keep current API untouched, while warning subsequent guys right way to
populate ioctls. :) Then the last question is: is it worthy of some
efforts to modify these APIs completely? Maybe the bee just bites
once...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.702 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site