Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Subject | RE: [PATCH] incorrect use of sizeof() in ioctl definitions | Date | Wed, 8 Oct 2003 17:58:53 +0800 | From | "Tian, Kevin" <> |
| |
Well, I may misunderstand the measurement here. By previous comment from Matthew Wilcox, I see "Clearly it's too late to change the ioctl definitions...". Er, so all things like IOR_BAD and size_t are just to keep current API untouched, while warning subsequent guys right way to populate ioctls. :) Then the last question is: is it worthy of some efforts to modify these APIs completely? Maybe the bee just bites once... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |