lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Blockbusting news, results are in
From
Date
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:05:15 EDT, "Richard B. Johnson" said:

> If the respondent wants them isolated into a "BADBLOCKS" file,
> he can make a utility to do that. It's really quite easy because
> you can raw-read disks under Linux, plus there is already
> the `badblocks` program that will locate them.

Yes, it's trivially easy to figure out that block 193453 on /dev/hdb is bad.
It's even not too bad to map that to an offset on /dev/hdb4. Even if you're
using LVM or DM to map stuff, it's still attackable. But how do you guarantee
that block 193453 gets allocated to your badblocks file and not to some other
file that just tried to extend itself by 32K?

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.049 / U:0.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site