Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 Jan 2003 19:50:00 +0000 | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: observations on 2.5 config screens |
| |
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> I guess, depending on your definition of fundemental. I would put any > option which affects the kernel as a whole in that category, myself. > Compiling with frame pointers comes to mind, since every object file is > changed and there are performance implications as well.
No-one other than kernel hackers should be playing with that option, hence it's in the kernel hacking menu.
> Processor option would select the processor and any architecture dependent > options, I would think. Something like "kernel characteristics" could have > options like smp.
SMP isn't a processor option ?
Dave
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |