Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Subject | Re: observations on 2.5 config screens | From | Robert Love <> | Date | 08 Jan 2003 10:53:15 -0500 |
| |
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 09:32, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Someone else suggested putting all the low level options like preempt, > smp, and the stuff in kernel-hacking into a single menu, with a better > name.
I do not think I like this. SMP, kernel preemption, and high memory support are the three most fundamental choices one makes during configuration.
They should be out in the open, in the beginning, in a well-labeled category. They only issue I see is "processor options" should be renamed "core options" or whatever. But that is trivial.
Robert Love
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |