Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:45:47 +0100 (CET) | Subject | Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? | From | "Emiliano Gabrielli" <> |
| |
<quote who="Oliver Neukum"> > Am Montag, 13. Januar 2003 00:05 schrieb Emiliano Gabrielli: >> <quote who="Rob Wilkens"> >> >> > On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 17:43, Oliver Neukum wrote: >> >> It's code that causes added hardship for anybody checking the locking. >> > >> > I can certainly see where it would seem "easier" to match "one lock" to "one >> unlock" if your troubleshooting a locking issue. >> > >> > "easier" is the motivation behind using goto.. Laziness.. that's all it is. >> >> In italy we say "Non c'è peggior sordo di chi non vuole sentire" > > There's no worse fate than that of those who don't want to listen? (My Italian is > bad.)
It is better than my english :-))
> >> Till to this point the thread was useful to beginners becouse of a lot of smarty >> coders explained a point that everyone has heard but that rarely knows at deep... >> >> but now Let's ignore him ! He is not a beginner he is a lamer! > > Very well. What could be said has been said. But please don't insult him. Time spent > explaining is usually well spent. Perhaps somebody learned. >
I agree .. my apologises .. I use currently the word "lamer" in IRC, but I don't really know the true translation.. if it is an insult .. plz adcept my apologises
> OK, maybe I have a soft spot. >
:-)
> Regards > Oliver
-- Emiliano Gabrielli
dip. di Fisica 2° Università di Roma "Tor Vergata"
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |