Messages in this thread | | | From | Oliver Neukum <> | Subject | Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? | Date | Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:23:12 +0100 |
| |
Am Montag, 13. Januar 2003 00:05 schrieb Emiliano Gabrielli: > <quote who="Rob Wilkens"> > > > On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 17:43, Oliver Neukum wrote: > >> It's code that causes added hardship for anybody checking the locking. > > > > I can certainly see where it would seem "easier" to match "one lock" to > > "one unlock" if your troubleshooting a locking issue. > > > > "easier" is the motivation behind using goto.. Laziness.. that's all it > > is. > > In italy we say "Non c'è peggior sordo di chi non vuole sentire"
There's no worse fate than that of those who don't want to listen? (My Italian is bad.)
> Till to this point the thread was useful to beginners becouse of a lot of > smarty coders explained a point that everyone has heard but that rarely > knows at deep... > > but now Let's ignore him ! He is not a beginner he is a lamer!
Very well. What could be said has been said. But please don't insult him. Time spent explaining is usually well spent. Perhaps somebody learned.
OK, maybe I have a soft spot.
Regards Oliver
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |