Messages in this thread | | | From | "Clayton Weaver" <> | Date | Fri, 10 Jan 2003 22:31:04 -0500 | Subject | Re: What's in a name? |
| |
The whole thing has depended on gcc from day one, so I see no valid objection to prominently give GNU credit for providing a decent compiler and thus saving Linus the work of inventing that before he started on his kernel.
But most users simply don't care what it is called, they only care whether it works.
I would guess that the name that gets used the most informally is "Linux", simply because that is shorter to type in email or Usenet messages than any of the alternatives presented in this discussion. "Linux" is thus the de facto standard name of the system, regardless of who invented what parts of it and who distributes it.
(It's kind of like a beer label. It could be any brand in the world, but it's still just "beer" if you're in a hurry.)
Regards,
Clayton Weaver <mailto: cgweav@email.com>
-- _______________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
Meet Singles http://corp.mail.com/lavalife
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |