Messages in this thread | | | From | Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <> | Subject | 2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19??? (was e1000/2.4) | Date | Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:14:11 +0200 |
| |
hi all
David S. Miller tells me here that '2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than 2.4.19 anyways'
is this correct?
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: e1000/2.4 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:42:55 -0700 (PDT) From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> To: roy@karlsbakk.net
If you get "a patch" it almost certainly won't build because the e1000 driver in 2.4.20-preX depends upon the NAPI stuff we added to the 2.4.x tree
2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than 2.4.19 anyways :-)
-------------------------------------------------------
-- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester ProntoTV AS - http://www.pronto.tv/ Tel: +47 9801 3356
Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |