Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:59:44 +0300 | From | Muli Ben-Yehuda <> | Subject | Re: [patch] __func__ -> __FUNCTION__ |
| |
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 01:13:04AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > > > > Followup to: <3D58A45F.A7F5BDD@zip.com.au> > > By author: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> > > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > > > --- linux-2.5.31/include/linux/kernel.h Wed Jul 24 14:31:31 2002 > > > +++ 25/include/linux/kernel.h Mon Aug 12 23:09:31 2002 > > > @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ > > > #include <linux/types.h> > > > #include <linux/compiler.h> > > > > > > +#define __func__ __FUNCTION__ /* For old gcc's */ > > > + > > > /* Optimization barrier */ > > > /* The "volatile" is due to gcc bugs */ > > > #define barrier() __asm__ __volatile__("": : :"memory") > > > > Shouldn't this be conditional on the version? > > Could be. But I don't know what version to use.
How about:
/* early gcc compilers lose on __func__ */ #ifndef __func__ #define __func__ __FUNCTION__ #endif /* !defined __func__ */ -- "Hmm.. Cache shrink failed - time to kill something? Mhwahahhaha! This is the part I really like. Giggle." -- linux/mm/vmscan.c http://vipe.technion.ac.il/~mulix/ http://syscalltrack.sf.net [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |