Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 24 Jul 2002 02:52:32 +0200 (MET DST) | From | Mikael Pettersson <> | Subject | Re: CPU detection broken in 2.5.27? |
| |
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:08:52 -0700 (PDT), Patrick Mochel wrote: >> I meant ->x86_model there, I assume you did too, and you have a 0xF24/0xF27 cpu. >> I wasn't aware these were HT aware. In fact, only 0xF50 are confirmed. >> Interesting. > >Actually, it's Family 15, Model 1, Stepping 2. Though the HT capability >shows up, it's disabled, so it's one of the pre-Foster P4s (though I don't >know what they're called).
cpuid 0xF12 is a standard Willamette core P4; I have one heating my room :-) Model 2 should be Northwood, AFAIK.
But why the table? Aren't you using the extended cpuid levels and/or the BrandID to get the names for cpuid 0x680 (coppermine) and above cpus?
/Mikael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |